I literally said nothing that remotely implied this, you jumped to that conclusion out of nowhere
So why arenāt they doing all the things you (correctly) said I was doing?
They are doing literally what iāve said.
CHICKEN-VK was rank 1 sentinel at 396 wave, a player called Sirus surpassed him at wave 400. In time someone will hit 410ā¦ thats how the game should be.,
OK I think I give up at this point. In your mind there is only one possible explanation for Warlocks being higher on the board than youā¦ class imbalance and thus Warlocks must be nerfed.
No possibility itās just that some players are better than you
No possibility itās just that some builds are better at arena
No possibility that the most popularly played classes will show better results on the board
No possibility that this could be just 2 simple bugs (which it is) that will be fixed in due course
Nope - it has to be a NERF.
IF thats your level of argument thats the best thing you could do.
Yes buddy, warlocks are hitting wave 2000 while 3 other classes hit 400 because nobody play good as locksā¦ thats definitely the case 
1 Like
12345
I play a non bugged Lock and Iām happy as a camper. The other guy just runs his mouth. D4 lost far more from going over board then balancing their game. Heck if they would make a poll I guss a lot of people will be for nerfs of overperformant builds.
Noone asked for perfect balance. Just cut down the overperforming builds and buff the underperforming thatās all. At the end of the day Mike said 300 Corrupiton is endgame not 2300 ^^.
Is it? You think there are no good players in the other classes at all? I donāt think so and if you do i think you are wrong.
1 Like
I study politics, psychology and philosophy.
I work with statistics about different behaviors and results, in a way they can be measured in the best way, this part of my daily life, despite the complexity between them.
For something subjective and/or complex to be measured in the best way, it will always be the overall statistics.
With all this considered, it is easy to say that statistics will ALWAYS be more accurate than your opinion.
Statistically, most classes and specs have a similar result.
This is a fact not an opinion.
āGood players play warlock and bad players donāt play warlockā
This is an opinion not a fact.
And yet all that nonsense doesnāt tell you this is down to BUGS and not BALANCE?
Sheesh
So basically you are the least qualified person on the forums to judge if a class needs a nerf.
Nerfs should be based on pure facts and maths and never on politics, psychology or philosophy. Though its plain to see a couple of these are behind your drive on this nerf crusade.
My premise is that i HAVE to deal with statistics even outside of the game, but you just cherrypick because you are dishonest.
iām rank 1 on my spec, the weakest spec in the game.
No. I think the class with the highest numeric (not %age) population of good players will end up posting the best results. Right now that is the 2 new classes. You knowā¦ because they are new.
Having a vested interest in the issue makes you even less qualified to call for nerfs.
The game is new so all classes are new for the biggest part of the playerbaseā¦ you know the over 1 mill copys they sold. So far only a fraction of said players played the game and I guess not all of them play warlock and falconer and I donāt think all people go for this 2 classes only.
The bugs need to go and then we need to look at blancing again. What weāll get is bugfixing and a nerf and all the crybabys will go into babyrage mode. I donāt know why EHG let those buged builds go on for so long because right now we only have unrealistic data.
This game needs fixes asap and nerfs to the numerical data EHG has AFTER the fixes. Arena is not a good indicator for balancing because I would 100% play a completely different build in arena if I gave a rats ass about arena. I just feel dirty even playing Warlock because the class CAN BE so delulu itās not even fun to play it or admit that you play it no matter how legit your build is.
1 Like
You said that objective numbers that are similar to each other is a ālogical fallacyā.
Then you said that it is only possible to measure something if all numbers are the same in each spec.
Then in the next sentence you refuted yourself by saying that there are more good players in the class warlock.
Your opinion has literally 0 credibility, as you have demonstrated contradiction and lack of knowledge on the subject countless times.
Yes I spewed a whole lot of reasons as to why a multi-class leaderboard can never be balanced.
The only thing that matters is this is bug issue not a balance issue. Something you will not concede.
I am playing blast rain build with marksman. I have all res capped plus 2k health and %50 endurance. I am kinda missing my gloves but even with these i need to dodge most of the things, need to play carefully so i dont get one shotted by random monster abilty. Meanwhile there is a charecters have samethings plus 20k ward all the time. How am i suppose to compete against that ? 
I do agree there are some charecters stronger but this is absurd. I saw some guys playing warlock had 80k ward. You dont need to do mechanichs or anything else, just press 1 button and clear everything. Facetanking every mechanic is and having a huge dps is definetly absurd.
Just one thingā¦ no matter how much i approve or dissaproove with @Ghostlight he is arround for a long time and most likely forgot more about the game then you learned in the few days you are arround. His knowledge is legit and itās the most stupid thing for someone to call out is fresh to game.
Then again you arenāt completely wrong as well but he said bugs needed to be fixed and thatās true. You said balance needs to be achivedā¦ but balance canāt be achived when EHG leaves the bugs ingame and nerf stuff according to the buged state of the game.
You are both right and you are both wrong. On the other hand just keep going that ādialogā is entertaining.
THATS EXACTLY THE PROBLEM.
The game is ALREADY balanced between MULTIPLE classes/specs, thats not something that COULD happen but something that IS ALREADY happening.
iāve already proved that here 
Most specs are very close to each other, objectively, its not an opinion.
12345
Why you are ignoring your refuted premise??