Feel free to look through the thread. As i said above, your perfectly fine with silencing criticism. That is not the issue. The issue is the lying about it.
Now if you want to ban me go ahead. But keep in mind I ain’t criticizing you all, I am supporting your decision. I merely pointing out the fact bellow that what you saying is untrue. Have a fun read and have a good day.
Case 1: inappropriate
I dont think the devs would consider this change even if i wrote it in a more articulated way, these are the people who could not get servers working with the funding of tencent who has 100K people and somehow are incompetent enough to ask players on feedback instead of just fixing things as would be common sense.
I dont expect the devs anything outside of messing stuff up harder. i use emotions for the masses and leave facts for the few is a well known expression that explains well. Since facts do not sway them, maybe emotion will
nothing wrong with saying this. Tencent has 100K people working for them. You are all funded by them, where exactly is this innapropriate? I expect better from professional developers in a large company
Case 2: Innapropriate
I agree. My voidknight is bricked his potential cause some clown amongst the devs thought it was a good idea to not add mana pots to LE.
Point of ARPGs is to make crazy build, sticking a rod in wheels of mana regen is such a borked decision the person who made it should be fired and never work on another design idea again. Why this game should been fully offline like all proper arpgs
**there is nothing inappropriate about calling bad game devs to be fired. Irl incompetent people are laid off. Simple fact of life. **
Case 3: Innapropriate
You have articulated very well, and i would say better then the vast majority of people probably could. I think we all appreciate feedback from a developer especially since the feedback we provided has been similar.
Go make your own game, you would likely do it better then these clowns. Cant even get servers working after 5 years in early access.
**Advising someone to make their own game is not inappropriate. **
Case 4: Innapropriate
From development stand point why would they? 95% of players are casuals so will never use cycles or any of the end game stuff- I suspect the devs are intentionally not fixing anything as they want to force most people offline to save costs.
I think they are just “saying” they are working, but not actually doing anything, because no way 90+ devs can not figure this out. Only reason its not fixed, is they are not fixing it.
Once people quit or beat campaign it will go down, and will be playable. Just is what it is
there is nothing Innapropriate about whaf i said here.
These are the main examples. However you also removed the posts where i showed that grinding in LE is largly a waste of time.
Case 1
Have fun yall. After watching, did you come down to the same conclussion as me?
providing functional content is not spam
tldr
Posts have been censored. That is fine, jts ok to censor posts. Just do not pretend or lie that is not the case. Toxic positivity is not something to strive for. You all should know that i think