Quoting to enforce this point.
Have to say this attitude in this forum is really problematic and pervasive since months now
Here’s the thing though, everybody has different opinions of what is good or otherwise for the game (as is apparent in this thread & many others including those where you & I have disagreed). Heavy takes things that he sees as problems seriously & argues for them, but that doesn’t mean they’ll be things that you or I think are problems & vice versa. That’s what I was trying to get at in my reply to that particular section of Jesse’s post.
1 Like
This section is an open section and is called “Feedback and suggestions”
Now let’s look at how TESTING is done.
Normally you pay people to test your stuff and they tell you what’s going on.
The name comes from physical objects (imagine with input and an output) that had a real “return loop” that altered the input hence the name “feedback loop”
There exist scenarios where you have short sessions and why not sometimes done by people of a target pool who never played a game or genre or almost, with the intention of seeing how “it tastes raw”
Here in this board we are giving MY and OUR feedback, for FREE and after countless hours. Done by more or less experienced people, and having played like 20h should not matter too much actually, you just take it into account and give it weight.
Now take someone who’s been asked to play the game for 5-8h or for 1 week and he comes back saying: skills A and B don’t look good, I didn’t know how to make C work, D was boring.
As the developer who paid and engaged somebody to test your stuff, would you tell them: i know buddy but you need to play another 200h, and i disagree with a lot of stuff you said, and that other one works it’s just you need to make it work (?)
I understand you are a so called “evangelist”, but this is not the right place to evangelize, this is the feedback section, and you have to evangelize this game in places like “what arpg to play?” threads.
The devs are to take our feedback (or not actually) and convince us with a patch and a release, we are here because this is the channel we have to write down our impressions (hoping for a fix/etc), not to “get convinced” of how much we should play to appreciate something, and so.
I am going to link below the threads where I’ve spotted this attitude, you don’t really need to dig much actually. It is pervasive and let me warn you again, this is very damaging and turns any potential new “evangelists” away more than keeping them because the impact is that you feel like the “feedback secion” while in good faith is actually obfuscated/derailed and counter-argued ad-infinitum
Yes, it’s an open section where you give your feedback & other people reply, maybe they agree, maybe they don’t.
The devs have previously said that they value the initial feedback from both long time aRPG players as well as people new to the genre & I agree that that is a good thing along side feedback from people who have more experience in the genre & more experience with LE specifically.
If I were that developer I would want to know that, but I’d also want to know that early on skill X is disappointing, but later on it’s really good. While the former is important feedback, so is the latter. If they only got the former, maybe they’d rework the skill completely into something different (like they kinda did with Mark for Death), if they only got the latter they wouldn’t make any changes & that probably wouldn’t be great either. Ideally they’d get both & be able to tweak the early-game feel of the skill to improve it while leaving the feel of it in the late game.
I’m not sure I quite agree with that, I’d want to point out things that someone giving feedback may not have thought about to enable them to give more nuanced feedback.
Edit: Getting back to the OP’s original post, I would like to see more interesting/out-there skills (tornados of rotting corpses, zombie macaques, etc), but I’m more interested in how the skill functions rather than how it looks, and more nodes that change how it works (like quite a few of the Rogue skills). IMO, if the devs go through all of the old skills & Rogue-them up a bit that’s only going to be a good thing.
1 Like
Considering you had issues scaling multiple skills, not only one. I just assumed that it is most likely not a bug, that prevents scaling of those skills.
That’s where my assumptions came from, that you most likely either did something wrong or didn’t understand any of the mechanics involved in scaling a skills damage, or you expect vastly different results in scaling certain things.
Because i can savely say, that trying to scale any skill on the trainings dummy (or even mobs, with slightly lower effect) always worked for me.
As i already stated, i never used that specific interaction. Itm ight be a big nerf, but it seems justified.
I always used Bone Curse in different ways(with none of the mentioned nodes) and never felt, it was “weak”.
I usually only quote specific parts, that i want to address. But i usually have the “whole” post in mind, when answering some1
Totally agree, people sometimes have vastly different views or expectations from “testing” stuff.
In this case, trying to scale specific skills.
I only wanted to say that for those specific examples (Rip Blood and Bone Curse) i never encountered any issues with their scaling.
The maths itself often times is not difficult. But the implications, how to use certain game systems/mechanics and how they intertwine does vary from game to game.
I noticed this several times already, where people coming from similar games, like PoE or GD: think, they know how things work
All this being said, maybe it just comes down to me and you expecting very different things from certain systems, i don’t know.
But if this is really a “potential problem” for you, you might want to consider doing athread about it and we can talk more about it. Since it’s gettign a bit off-topic.
-
All of this are just numbers, changing nothing in actual gameplay. Would Necro become more unique with her minions / lifedrains getting stronger because of her STR instead of INT ?
-
What if I wish to make a ranger with a shield and no dodge? One of reasons we play this kind of games - character building, especially when we’re able to create something completely different to any selected origin.
-
Skeletons → Macaques (diablo?), shield charge → bear charge…
So you’re talking about visuals? Well, PoE has zombies → mummies or golden statues (correct if I’m wrong) and it’s possible monetization mechanism for LE. But it’s not a gameplay change (though it’s something I’d glad to see someday). -
Lightning stuns: Stun mechanics is already there.
-
Horrifying fireballs: interesting thing. I’ve posted some ideas like these. And though I was trying to solve different problems, I can partially agree with your words here.
On my personal taste LE has problems with visuals and performance. Yes, it’s better with every patch, but still is very low-level comparing to modern games. It would be perfect to have Wolcen’s graphics and campaign + LE skill trees 
.
1 Like
Personnally the fact the all the classes that has been already released are based on classic archetypes is not that much a problem for the me, the same way that everytime I play a CRPG , I don’t care that there is always the same playable classes. It’s not for that reason that I play those games.
But I can understand that the lack of renewal could be a hindrance.
I hope that the last masteries remaining (warlock/runemaster/falconeer) could be a partial answer to your request to release something more exotic, even though I find that the rogue masteries are in comparison to the other classes already a big leap.
I’ll use the title of your topic to express a different idea. In my opinion all the previous classes will need a makeover but in terms of gameplay (synergy between skills, combo, flow of animation, etc…).
After playing the rogue I honestly don’t know if I will be able to go back to the other classes as they are right now. The feeling of the gameplay is way way better with the rogue than the rest. In a way, the rogue release despite being “late” in the game development shows that a ton of work remains for the rest of the classes.
But I see it in a positive way for two reasons :
- The progress the devs have made compared to the beginning of the game
- The progression margin remaining which shows that there is more potential for improvment than I thought.
2 Likes
I read through some but not all of this thread, as it started getting a little too heavy (pun intended) in parts. From my cursory read, I’d say while the OP does have some legitimate points, it also seems like he may be missing some things, or maybe this is just not his style of game.
I’m not certain of this, but it almost sounds like he just wants the exact same mechanics literally covered with a makeover (a la D2 hydra or GW Mesmer). Not that there’s anything wrong with that, but I don’t know if the game would be “better” if instead of a scorpion shooting poison, I could summon a pangolin that shoots coronavirus. Would it be more “unique”? I guess so, but I don’t know if that is what the OP really wants? If so, maybe that can all be satisfied with future cosmetics.
When it comes to the gameplay, I don’t think you really see the specialness (I won’t say unique) until you’ve tried out some of the “endgame” builds that people have come up with. Especially ones that blend skills and passives from all 3 specialties. The overall game system allows for some combinations that result in truly different feeling and fun gameplay. I’ve played a crazy polar bear, a summoner who lets his tree dude machine gun everything down, a shaman that freezes everything on screen, a guy that just walks around and lets everything die of poison around him while his own health plummets to 0, and a necro spamming 50+ wraiths on the screen at once. Yes, the core mechanics and concepts are fairly “traditional” but again, I’m not sure how much is added to the gameplay (particularly at this stage) if I were to say, replace the wraiths with pink butterflies, or the spriggan with a watermelon spitting seeds.
So I guess I’m wondering if the OP wants brand new mechanics, or just improved dressing on the existing mechanics? I also wonder if he hasn’t more or less missed out on what the devs have done with the game in terms of providing a playground for interesting build concepts, or perhaps that wasn’t what he was interested in.
2 Likes
Rittchard, you’re pretty much on the mark there. I would like to see new mechanics and new visuals yeah, not every single thing needs to be changed obviously.
All these games go thru cycles of nerf/buff, its a well known fact. The reason being that nothing can ever truly be balanced in the way people think they should be. Ok ill concede that theres lots of endgame builds that look and feel entirely different to each other, but at some point every single player falls into the same routine - find the strongest build available, use it, spread it around on forums etc until it gets nerfed, then the cycle repeats. It might seem to keep the game fresh on paper, but in reality its just replacing one thing for another thing that was already there generally, not counting full skill reworks.
If a lot of different mechanics are introduced, it makes it a lot easier to make truly unique builds and a lot harder to get stuck in the cycle where once every 3 months a bunch of players QQ on the forums about how their fave toon is now useless after putting in months of work.
Guild Wars didn’t have the problem because the gear system was incredibly simple rather than overly complex. Obviously thats not a fix for arpgs, you can’t diminish whats already there, so all you can really do is add more systems/mechanics. Guild Wars accomplished this by providing massive amounts of skills and a lot of classes.
I think that would be the best choice for LE. Adding in more skills, that would make the classes seem far more interesting.
This is a big point, especially in the PoE community. It’s really more about the mindset of players, than how balanced the game is. Alot of PoE’s content is finite and can literally be done with every single skill. Same applies to LE.
But people always want “the best” or “the most efficient”. And i can understand that to a certain degree.
LE in it’s current state is already pretty balanced in most regard and literally every skill is viable. Only thing that forces you to play “meta” is arena. And there comes the issue, with this infinite scaling content, that kind of content brings out all the super strong or sometimes even broken builds.
I never expect or want a aRPG to be balanced perfectly, as you said. It’s basically not realstic to have a perfectly balanced game, that is as complex as LE or PoE.
All we need is enough diverse content to cater to all kind of different people.
If we get more masteries and more skills in the future (and also reworks/overhaul of older skills), that will be great for even more diverse build. But i think LE already is in a very good place, where you really can do what ever you want and you are really not forced to play “the best” builds.
Coming back on the topic of the danger of clone syndrome and “originals did it better”, problem to put a couple quotes I found while browsing steam reviews.
These are from another unrelated game that sprinkled from the brief “revival” moment done by Legends of Grimlock.
2nd review same “others did it better”:
This stuff does happen (reviews are from 2019 and january this year)
So yea to truly leave a mark, and get out of “ah yea that Poe clone something”, imo you gotta show first the unique perks of your game, and then push them to the max.
Actually imo they should even try to hide the homework/copycats or add them later, for example D3 necro was added way later and same in GD the “cyclone” was added in the 2nd expansion (as an “extra skill” of an otherwise very unique new class) ← this shows that the crowd that wants “always the same” is not the one that will make your game and can be made happy at a later stage, maybe.
What does it mean in LE? Well something like it’s been kinda talked about in this thread.
From my side I could talk about Sentinel: make all unique skills more visible, give them more emphasis to make them become “the LE skill”, make them work from lv0
- Make all branches of Vengeance work: make dark blades work, give emphasis to its effects rather than “yea just an autoattack with more autoattacks and some temp buffs”
- Rive same, make all branches work, make a new pass to the 1212 branches, get rid of weird stuff (unimpressive flat dmg at the cost of losing all aspd why exactly?)
Erasing strike, Manifest Armor, Forge Strike, Rebuke, Smelter Wrath…
Pretty much every single element in Sentinel has unusable branches, get rid of onkill stuff in all trees and skills, FG minions stuff, forge strike procs vs single target, channeling like Smelter wrath and Rebuke with a longass 2s cast time, Erasing Strike ancient mechanics (done before rive/veng/smite gave mana regen) that drains 100% mana for piss dmg etc
Plus every unique skill (not copied from diablo) needs a lot more emphasis in a build and needs to be more interesting/signature.
Also please DO rebalance the damage distribution and get rid of those chest/helm mods that require a 1-2k farm (truly rotfl) and enable like x2-10 dmg ← 99% of all these “such cool much dmg” builds are all about any skill done using 2k h farmed mods in chest and helm (to be real frank 2k hours is such a waste of time the thought makes me die inside)
Not saying that it is 100% bad, but at least for me there’s a pending queue and it is marked as needs to be addressed, before unblocking the game for me. The list is so long I’ll just stick by quoting OP’s general idea
1 Like
This is actually what I always feared was going to happen. It being made later than the others means that they had more experience and were able to make it much better than the earlier classes and now they don’t hold up.
1 Like
Yeah, as I said above, I think the creativity evident in the skill trees for the Rogue needs to be reflected in the other classes skill trees as well to allow for a smiliar level of synergies & stuff.
1 Like
One Rogue skill tree that I can’t really find any creativity at all with is Shurikens. The skill itself just has zero imagination and the more I look at it’s skill tree, the copies from other games jump out at you.
All of the skill altering nodes are directly ripped from other games. PoE Ethereal Knives + Sire of Shards for the Throwing Star node. Blade Shield is an obvious poor mans PoE Blade Vortex but with the added disadvantage that it doesn’t actually function without using an extra four skill points to make it pierce. Chakram is from D2/3. Deadly Aim node is just the same as the Embers node for the Mages Fireball spell. Ricochet is just like any Shield throw skill. The other skill nodes are just generic damage or effect/proc upgrades.
To be totally honest I failed to get very far with her at all as every skill tree feels like a ‘seen that done that’ and I just got bored. Perhaps I’m just becoming a miserable old git and need to take a break but I keep hearing that her skills are creative but so far I fail to see it.
While the rogue definitely has alot of those skills “that you would expect”, which sometimes seems a bit lacking in the creative department, i think EHG did a fantastic job of making even the most basic skill FEEL very good.
Skills like Puncture, Multishot or Shift are not mindblowing or have fancy VFX, but the animations, sounds and responsiveness are astonishing IMO.
It just feels good to play with them.
I agree, that some of the nodes individually are not super creative, but the beauty of LE’s skill tree system is, that you can mix and match alot of those nodes, which then makes them a bit more uniques.
And then we have some skills that are already baseline pretty unique.
Like Dancing Strikes, Lethal Mirage and Dark Quiver.
I personally don’t mind it that much, if stuff seems copied from other games, as long as they implemented it well and it feels good, which it definitely does.
1 Like
i think they could do more for the combination attack. they should just make flow a skill, add it to the skills list and let you link the 4-5 skills so that when you press the button it goes through those skills. any skill not linked say you put acid flask in slot 2 should not count or boost or use the charge.
i respeced out of the flow line because im not just going to constantly be spamming 4-5 different skills when i can just use flurry, acid flask, and that ring of steel clone and get the desired feel.
this is where they can do something new imo.
I really like the flow passive.
Your suggestion with a “design your own combo” skill is cool, but i don’t think we have enough skill at this point to make that happen, maybe in the future.
The good thing with stuff like the Flow Passive is, it’s a “passive” node, that does change your playstyle/rotation drastically. I do like when passive skills do that much in terms of actual gameplay.
1 Like
Sacred had combos like that, you could put up to 4 skills in a combo & it would execute each of them in order.
I know, i just think there would be some hurdles or issues with stuff like this in the current skill system.
I don’t dislike the idea, i just think LE is not ready for it at this point, but this could be a topic on his own.
If you or @DesireDemon really like this idea, it’s probably worth a thread on it’s own.
I’m all about innovation and risk taking and pushing boundaries, but I think you asking for it in areas that there is not so much space anymore. No matter how you treat a throwing hammer or a fireball, its function will look as something you have seen before. And if you mask it as something else, like a skull or a rock so that it doesnt look like a copy, the result will be the same. You dont have to reinvent the wheel to bring innovation. What arpgs can do, is change how those functions interact with the enviroment maybe or with other elements of the game etc. There will always be a projectile that can pierce/chain/explode, there will always be a ground aoe, there will always be a firestorm/avalanche/rain of arrows, there will always be a whirlwind/cyclone casue they simply work. What you do with them is where there is still room for innovation.
3 Likes