Seemingly you haven’t even watched the video then?
Because the statement is ‘I’m a voice against the major negativity’, which is his personal opinion, and the video setup is also well designed up until that point (which happens at around 2:30).
Also the statement is ‘I’m not saying people shouldn’t be mad’, which is a viable take, because yes… that’s the normal reaction here. They said ‘one time purchase’ and now it’s not that. Simple as that.
He’s also stating that people are outraged at the game getting paid DLC before being finished. Which yes… is also a very reasonable statement and more then understandable.
He also states he hasn’t been able to get into it very much, just not his style of game, but the foundations being solid. Which yes… is why people stayed after all despite all the shortcomings. That and the ‘player first’ direction.
He solely thinks that in the current situation the overall outcome is that EHG is ‘screwed’ plainly spoken. And yes, that’s a reasonable position to take with not only the things EHG presented but also in how they did it.
He also states that the sale to Krafton was a sale of community goodwill, which… yes, it absolutely is after all! And now to allow the goodwill to return and become even stronger, to be proven wrong with the worries EHG needs to provide vastly more then they’ve provided till now. And yes… that’s also a reasonable take. Same thing as how it happened with GGG selling to Tencent. But for EHG? They didn’t provide positives, for now it’s all negatives.
Then a list of all the stuff he likes in the game even comes, how much more positive do you expect this video to become?
The statement is extremely realistic and based… did you expect him to say ‘this will be great!’? Nothing points to it, quite the opposite for now. He would be one absolute moron to try that and get ripped a new one for it on top of it… besides it being extremely unlikely to happen. So a double-loss then.
Then for the second video:
The first thing which stated from his personal position was halfway through the video, and it’s the sentence: ‘I personally also don’t like that this is happening’ and it relates to the class being a paid DLC.
So until half-way, not a single negative word, just consolidation of information, it’s ‘news’ and nothing else.
The next thing is that he doesn’t really trust how the stuff will go with the history of EHG in mind, hence how well it will be made since the former releases didn’t turn out well. Either late or unpredictable in general after all. And that part ends with a hopeful sentence that against odds it might turn out well. More then based.
Because GGG stated that it’s first off: Only during their EA stage, and then it’s F2P. So it’s from a ‘bad’ position (not really) to a ‘good’ position. Which is the opposite of EHG which went from free to paid.
Then also because GGG didn’t make any switcheroo. The only one was that it’ll not be a rework of PoE 1 but instead a full-scale game instead, which is a improvement, especially since paid content is to be shared between both games, which is nigh unseen actually.
So obviously nobody speaks out, because GGG did right and EHG did wrong, simple as that. The difference should be more then clear.
People waited for MG to ‘play out’ and nothing major came. People waited for Uberroth to play out and it wasn’t adjusted. People waited for their release timings to be handled and it never happened properly.
See the pattern?
Trust is earned, not given.