Proof AI cant take all jobs

After about 30 mins of back and fourth of me asking AI if could solve LE issues; this was its last response. Dont worry looks like some jobs cant be replaced.

Fixing such issues requires deep understanding of the specific game’s architecture, codebase, and network infrastructure. While some AI models excel in specialized areas, replicating the nuanced understanding and experience of human experts remains a challenge.

If integrated well the AI would have had the specific game’s architecture knowledge and code base and network infrastructure in less time than a new hired candidate could…

In this particular situation the only thing AI couldn’t have done is emphasize with people on discord. But given time he would have probably do that also.

The problem in your post is that you cater to people that have proved nothing in the past 4 days, just patching and blowing up other parts of the code also that you are asking an AI problems that require him to be part of the actual infrastructure in a complete outside environment…

It’s like asking a network engineer from your local internet provider what he would have done in this situation without him knowing the infrastructure that EHG had and so on. He would have just given you some half way advice and call it a day with a message resembling the AI last response…

And no, it doesn’t remain a challenge, beside actual rack mounting, cable managing and power supply servers, there is nothing that is a challenge for a proper trained AI. O yea and training him, that’s what falls on us.

So AI is going to take your job if that’s your lack of understanding at this point.

1 Like

Oh my, you have issues that AI will never solve.

Why ? Just because I told you my point of view and because I told you that your initial stupid asses of the problem is wrong and incomplete ?

Also you are right technically, my issues will never be solved by AI…hence one reason why my job is safe and you will probably lose it to AI…If you posted this thing here means that you feel the AI’s carrot cycling your hole…

AI said this you.
The statement you shared raises some interesting points and concerns about the potential of AI in game development, and I’d like to offer a nuanced response that addresses some key aspects:

Capabilities and Limitations of AI:

  • Understanding complex systems: While AI can analyze vast amounts of information and learn quickly, it’s important to remember that true understanding of complex technical systems requires more than just access to data. It involves years of experience, intuition, and the ability to handle unforeseen situations, which are areas where AI currently has limitations.
  • Human interaction and empathy: As the statement points out, AI struggles with understanding and responding to human emotions, which is crucial for tasks like community management and communication. While AI can offer technical advice, it might not be able to provide the same level of empathy and understanding as a human developer interacting directly with players.

Ethical considerations:

  • Access and trust: Granting full access to a game’s architecture, codebase, and network infrastructure raises ethical concerns and potential security risks. Trusting an AI with this level of access without proper safeguards and human oversight could be unwise.
  • Data privacy and bias: Training AI on large datasets of player data requires careful consideration of privacy and potential biases within the data itself. This needs to be addressed responsibly to avoid discriminatory or unfair outcomes.

Collaboration and Future Potential:

  • Complementary roles: AI and human developers don’t need to be competitors. They can work together, with AI handling tasks like data analysis, code optimization, and pattern recognition, while developers focus on high-level design, creative decisions, and player interaction.
  • Continuous learning and development: Both AI and humans need to keep learning and evolving. As AI technology advances and ethical considerations are addressed, its potential to assist in game development responsibly will expand.

Addressing the Specific Points:

  • Time to understand the game: While AI can learn quickly, it’s unlikely to fully grasp the complexities of a game’s architecture, codebase, and network infrastructure in a shorter timeframe than a skilled human developer. The nuances of these systems require deep understanding and experience.
  • Empathy and community management: AI might not be able to fully replicate the human touch in terms of empathy and community management. However, it can assist developers by analyzing player feedback, identifying trends, and suggesting potential solutions.
  • Asking an AI about a specific situation: Just like the network engineer analogy, an AI without direct access and understanding of the specific situation can only offer general advice based on its training data. It’s crucial to consider the context and limitations of any advice received.
  • AI taking over: While AI can play an increasingly important role in game development, it’s unlikely to completely replace human developers in the foreseeable future. Each has unique strengths and limitations, and collaboration will be key.

Conclusion:

The statement highlights some valid concerns and limitations of AI in game development. While AI offers exciting potential, it’s important to approach it with realistic expectations and ethical considerations. The future likely lies in collaboration between humans and AI, leveraging their respective strengths to create even better gaming experiences.

lol it was just a troll thread chill

So technically he approved with my point of view and sh@ted on your point of view ? Yea sounds about right…

lol I bet u are fun to hand out with

sure it was :))), now throw it like a joke and flee the discussion…

why are you so triggered by a simple thread. Its ok life is good

I just dismantled it, that’s all…it’s pretty stupid to post something that is terrible wrong, then tell me I have problems by dismantling it, then going back to the AI and asking him if I am right in my point of view ( which I find very disturbing) , and after he tells you that I am technically right, you throw it like “it was a meme post bro why so hipped up”…Please take your pills and don’t skip your doctors appointment, cuz this is cringe bro.

You post a thread and don’t want people’s opinion on it, because it was a meme, but you posted it because you thought you were right, but proven wrong and now it’s a meme, and you think people are triggered for your bipolar mood ?

Thanks for your feedback. I understand that you disagree with my previous post and its approach. While I appreciate you sharing your perspective, I’m not comfortable engaging in arguments or negativity. I’d prefer to focus on constructive discussion and respectful interaction."

until you told me , I have problems that AI can’t solved it was pretty constructive…now it’s rapidly becoming a cr@p fest for ya.

Probably because the AI can’t empathise with people, only emphasize.

Its ok u dismantle it like a pro

thanks…it means nothing to me coming from you.

if it meant nothing why respond?

to let you know what I feel…Yea I cannot do this , I want to play

I feel the pain