But it is. You saw a Swarmblade build that used Shattered Worlds while killing Uber. And somehow in your mind
this build uses Shattered Worlds and here is how it kills Uber
changed into
this build requires Shattered Worlds to kill Uber
But nobody said that Swarmblade Druid needs the Uber relic to kill Uber. You made it up.
He did exactly that, he was just less direct about it than me
I dont think the presence of Shattered Worlds invalidates the fact that it can kill Uberroth
Think about it.
You have a build that can kill Uber. And an item that’s an upgrade for the build drops. Will you equip that item?
Or will you not use it, because someone on the internet who later watches your video might think that you needed the new item to kill Uber?
Of course you will equip it…
Anyway, I already said that the Swarmblade build is from Maxroll and that their “Endgame” planner does NOT include any items from Uber.
Ty. But I mentioned swipe gs or ts. EQ is descent with TS and Swipe,
Swarmblade is a swarmblade build, having nothing to do with what I was ranting about.
No, you are just reading into it. As I stated my comment was more general and not directed at this particular build at all. I saw Shattered Worlds in the build planner and the thought came to my mind what many people build, and that’s what my comment was directed at. I never stated that that particular build required that Unique to do it, it was once again you reading between the lines and making a connection that I never made.
No, he didn’t. He can chime in further if he desires but you trying to argue what he was saying rather than him is rather ridiculous.
Just because someone points something out doesn’t mean they are telling someone that what they are expressing is “silly” or a “you problem.”
You initially started off by appearing to want to be helpful, but as soon as someone said something that wasn’t “wow, thank you for being so helpful!” you degraded to acting like a spoiled child that got his nose bent out of shape.
Just accept that people can make comments that aren’t all about you and you will have a much happier time.
I can accept that maybe I either made a mistake (which happens) or that I wasn’t clear (also happens, and was the case here).
To be fair, in any class most skills won’t be Uby killers either. Uby was made hard on purpose with the intent that only a few builds would be able to kill him in any class.
Yep, it looks truthful to me. Yet, why not dream of some viable AA options
As I said - the game does give a feeling of a healthy progression for some builds where every choice matters. It’d be great to have more of them rather than just “grab just these nodes and yellow gear and obliterate everything” or “get these 2 uniques and u r good to go up to 500+ corr without any decisionmaking”
No, you misunderstand.
YOU have a problem with killing Uber on a melee Primalist. I don’t and YOU didn’t like the links I provided, so finding your own is the next logical step.
Source: you made it up.
Except you literally pointed to a specific build I posted:
When the discussion topic is “Can melee primalist kill Uber?”, I post a melee primalist uber kill video, and you point to that video and say “I have a problem with any Uber kills that use Uber items, and this last one uses Uber item”, that means you are accusing that particular video of the problem you described.
If your reply was a general opinion about all Uber kills, there would be no need to point to a specific video.
You literally did.
I understand now, you have some comprehension issues. Let me try to help:
Go to Llama’s reply again.
Notice that the quoted part is the paragraph where you point to a specific video. NOT the general part.
Then read the first sentence of his reply.
Repeat as many times as needed until it clicks.
As soon as someone called your “legitimate issue” a silly and personal problem, you started making up bad excuses - that you “didn’t point to all the linked builds” (nobody contested that) and that you “didn’t direct your comment at a particular build” (you very clearly did), and now you’re using ad hominem. Just because someone stated their opinion about your issue.
It sure sounds like you’re projecting onto others.
Can you show me where did I ask for gratitude for posting in this topic?
Where did I expect to receive it?
I sure hope you didn’t just make up an excuse by “reading into it”, then project that onto me aswell
I’m actually building my werebear on atk speed, earthquake/afterschock on meele hit and so far I am very optimistic that it will work out. pushing aftershocks to the limit and with swipe triggering those, my bear minion casting earthquake directly nearly everything goes fast down. The primal relic (up to 60% more effect on idols) gives me close to 200% aftershock on a melee hit
It really doesn’t matter as you will only see things the way you want to and the facts don’t matter. Done with any attempt at an intelligent conversation with you.
not quite sure if my bear does more dmg than me… since earthquake scales with his stats and not mine. But yeah, I use more than just a single melee atk
TBH, that feels like it’s going to require me going back & re-reading stuff & I kinda can’t be arsed, sorry. Though having said that, I’ve just done it, so…
This bit felt like you were implying that builds with the drops from Uberroth were invalidated as “Uberroth killers”. If that’s not what you meant then fair enough.
That sounds sufficiently non-meta for me to be interested, how’s it going?
Dude, I wasn’t asking for help, I can google. That’s a suggestions and feedback section. Plz, go teach someone somewhere else, for Christ’s sake.
Prove me wrong. I haven’t found a single one so far (stop calling builds where a pet does all the damage an uber killing AA build)
As s1 already said above - let’s end this BS of an argument. You showed your point from the very first comment here. We are talking different things here, dunno why that insistent intent to prove me wrong and sell your point of view.
and YOU didn’t like the links I provided, so finding your own is the next logical step.