Yes, I’m more into paying for an expansion that adds a whole range of stuff rather than incrementally small microtransactions for a new class here, a trial mode there…
This has the tendency to quickly add up to quite a bit.
Don’t forget that developers need to prove their financial success, especially when they’re dependent on higher-level studios. This is the right decision, and I’m happy to support EHG and their development.
Make supporter packs INCLUDE paid classes, I would buy it as always! 
really…??
This sadly, is purely Krafton’s influence. If EHG doesn’t do it, they get shut down.
Our voices are pointless, EHG CANNOT listen to the us anymore.
Dear Judd,
As I’m getting closer to my 40’s, I’m still confused how come some many people believe their needs and desires will be met for free. I think most people with an IQ over 79 understand basic principles of capitalism and are more than ready to pay for expansions.
Like many others I’m personally concerned about two things:
- Yep, no spiritborn please. Make sure these new classes have S-tier builds but no God-tier, please. Don’t make your game pay to win.
- Please add some more end-game activities. Hope the money will help you to do so.
Best wishes.
Paid dlc is exactly one of the reasons i uninstalled and will never play diablo4 again, you repeat their mistake. Its one thing to have paid mtx or even QoL features (like extra stashes or something), but paid classes / content is a huge nono.
Bye last epoch.
You bought D4 expecting them to never release an expansion? Seriously?
The question is: What exactly is the pay-2-win aspect in this case?
There’s no PvP, and if the class is so powerful that you can take down every boss in seconds and fill the bazaar with loot, that could theoretically lead to lower prices. Okay, you have a broken market, but you don’t necessarily need the bazaar. And if the class is too strong, it will have to be nerfed later, otherwise the players will go on strike.
So, what do you “win” by paying for the class? And this question is somewhat rhetorical, because we don’t know nearly enough yet.
Currently, I’d say it sounds like “pay-2-play-differently.”