My Account
× My Account Forum Buy Now

Last Epoch Forums

How does flurry apply ailments?

The tooltip says flurry has 40% reduced chance to apply ailments. How does this actually function? Let’s say I have 50% chance to apply bleed on my gear and passive tree. Would flurry have 10% (50-10) or 30% (60% of 50 is 30) chance to apply bleed?

There are nodes in Flurry’s tree that apply ailments. One gives 100% chance to slow. Another gives bleed, poison, and shred to the different hits. How does this work with Flurry’s 40% ailment reduction? Would that slow node only give 60% slow (if it was your only source of slow)? For that other node, if it worked this way, it would only be effective with all 4 points if this was your only source for these things, because each point gives 10%. If this is how it works, I’m sure a lot of players won’t pick up on this and would take this node pointlessly.

Afaik it is this way:
That 40% less chance to apply ailments is meant for any chances outside the tree. If you have 100% chance to apply bleed just from gear, attacking with flurry has only a 60% chance to apply bleed per hit. This is because of balancing the fucking fast AS of flurry with ailments.

But for all values in the flurry tree, these don’t fall under that 40% restriction. These values state the actual real chances if applying ailments with a flurry hit. Else all these numbers would be misleading because you would have to factor the 40% lless chance into the calculation by yourself.

So for example:
Bleed chance with flurry = [(Bleed chance from all sources outside the flurry tree) x 0.6] + (Bleed chance from flurry tree)

So 100% from gear transform into 60% for flurry. Additional 10% from flurry tree are just added to this so it would be 70%.

Just note that the increased chances for ailments from the tree don’t apply to all the flurry hits per cast. The first hit for example only increases poison chance. Only the second hit has increased chance for bleed.

1 Like

Thank you, Raw Suicide! However, I wished you didn’t use the number 100 in your example, because that results in me still not knowing the answer to the first question (any other number would of worked). So is the 40% subtracted or multiplied? In my example with 50, is it 10 or 30?

I’m pretty sure it is 30

None of any %increases or decreases(or more/less) are substracted or added, they are always multiplied.

This not only applies to this ailment example, but also general damage calculation.

I highly suggest you reading the game guide section about “Increases”, “More” and “Added”.
Because when you want to apply “increases” and “more” modifiers to the same thing, there is some priority, how they get calculated.

1 Like

Oh… I thought it was clear from:

Apart from when the % increases are all added together then applied, which I think was the OP’s confusion, since the text for flurry says it has a reduced (as in increased/reduced) chance to apply ailments which following the logic used for all other increased/reduced modifiers would mean that it’s added to the chance to apply ailments when really it should be applied as a more/less modifier.

@Hackaloken could we get this text changed?

I don’t find this confusing at all.

It would make no sese to have a flat reduction in ailment frequency.

That would be super bad for early game and meaningless in endgame.

But you have flat increases to ailment chance using the same increased/reduced language. It’s inconsistent & should be changed since the 40% acts as a more/less not an increased/reduced.

It’s just wrong.


But the ailment frequency is something that affects all ailments across the board and it’s very clear to me, that it applies to all ailments inflicted by that particular skill.

It’s an entire different mechanic comapred to any stat that gives you “x% increase chance to bleed”.

So in the contexts it’s used I don’t think it’s wrong.

It is completely wrong. Why would you use a word to mean one mathematical operation in one context & the opposite in a slightly different but related operation?

If it were % reduced damage, you wouldn’t expect it to do 40% less damage would you?

It’s wrong. I’m glad you know how it works & I do as well, but that doesn’t change the fact that it’s incorrect & can confuse people.

It doesn’t even say “multiplicative with other modifiers”, so going purely from the language used, it shouldn’t do what you say it does, it should be a flat modifier to the ailment chance.

The game needs to be consistent in it’s use of terminology (increased/reduced, more/less, allies, etc) across the board so that players can easily understand what the game is telling them, rather than having to think whether this one use of a term is the exception to the rule.

1 Like

This exactly. I think it needs be changed, too. If it acts like a more/less modifier, and not a increased/reduced, then it needs to reflect that in its wording (as Llama8 so nicely put it in the previous post).