It is obvious that you dont know what you are talking about. There will be always more skill synergies within party then solo or you can dedicate char to classic roles like tank/support/damage. You will see how many builds will be there in future which will be MP specific. It is absolutly normal in MP enviroment.
2 Likes
I admire your stamina. I would have given up 2 or 3 posts ago I think lol.
Some people don’t want to learn or listen.
But at least it’s entertaining for me to read some of the lunacy of some people here. 
2 Likes
What do you mean by “should”?
- The devs “should” balance and reduce / remove synergies to limit the advantages?
or
- In theory there is no big advantage?
If it’s 2, you’re absolutely wrong. There are crazy possibilities to create op synergies, if they don’t get artificially limited. In SP you are limited in creating synergies between masteries. That restriction is gone in MP when you can buff your Lich friend with your Necro’s dread Shade (an example tha Lizard gave in one of his videos).
Also if you followed the MP posts, you know that enemies only scale with hp, not damage. That makes MP easier than SP. Enemy damage is distributed to several players (so the portion in general is lower) while player damage is more than doubled because of debuffs and skills that synergize.
If you mean 1, then what’s the purpose of MP if not creating some nice synergies? That’s also something EHG stated during development. They want well coordinated groups to perform better than a bunch of strangers.
Who’s demanding that? All the people discussing here have stated several times, that they want a form of restricted trading, similar to the Bazaar concept that EHG hat in the works.
There are also some threads suggesting other restrictive methods of trading. That’s all some people want. Maybe there still are people that want unrestricted trading. But these people are somewhere else and not participating in the current discussions.
Only every day somebody thinks to create a new thread and throw the same arguments around like others before. Same lame arguments, same lame answers. Everything is going in circles.
2 Likes
Does that actually mean something when viewed through your blinders?
Both concepts sounded good to me.
This didn’t age well, though 
Stick to your vision EHG. Don’t listen too much to community desires. You know best, what systems you want in your game… oh wait… 
1 Like
That post aged just fine. Me from 4 years ago stands by that post, the whole post.
2 Likes
Wow that original thread was from 2018, interestingly right away theres a link to GGGs trade manifesto written by Chris in 2017 when he was actually involved with development instead of collecting cards, its actually well written and touches on every point in this thread but this was written regarding players wanting an ‘auto trade’ style system like an AH
Its a massive manifesto, key points:
-They want players to be able to trade but they didnt really at first (no trade windows, no API’s for shops etc)
-Items are extremely important to be able to trade and progress and better gear is a sign of progression
-Big on player ownership of items
-Trade should be difficult
-Automation problems
Heres the thing, GGG knows players and I quote “Easy trade reduces the number of times a character improves their items.” this is not true on a new league character, you upgrade continually, on second/third character where you have established gear this is largely true
The fundamentals is they think trade makes the game too easy but they know it has to exist and repeatedly kept up with player demand, they added in SSF and STILL allow people to exit anytime into trade league, and the final:
“Easy trade means reducing drop rates
Compare two hypothetical games. In the first game, trade is very difficult. The majority of items that can’t be used by your character are not traded to other people. In the second game, trade is very easy. Many of the items that you can’t use are traded to other people for items that you can. In the second game, because of trade, you have a much higher acquisition rate of useful items. While that sounds great if you want instant gratification, in reality it means that the second game either receives reduced drop rates relative to the first, or ends up being a whole lot easier and less challenging to achieve goals in”
He is basically saying trade = easy mode but there is also reduced drop rates. Which is meaningless in games where bosses drop the best loot on a fixed lootable on a dice roll, reduced drop rates dont affect the pinnacle content anyway
Reducing drop rates in LE means slightly less Fire resistance shards, you get guaranteed exalt/rune/glyph drops from monoliths anyway, really does 400% rarity do ANYTHING?
I want trade as its a better experience for the player, but I was really keen to see the shitstorm of trade problems and how this game was going to handle it but instead they took the dev route and made it a better experience for them (way less hassles)
Realistically LE needs about 3-5 more years of content for a robust trading system, theres nothing to support it and for about the 6-8th time ever; Gold should of just been straight either removed or replaced with ‘Timeline currency’ you know something unique to your game…
2 Likes
Hey Mike,
I Don’t know how to understand your response.
Because
→ We want trading with an economy, although with some restrictions ←
Is a bit different than
→ We think trading and economy has too many downsides and we think LE is a better game without ←
These two messages I get from EHG, although one (yours) might be a more personal stance while the other is an official statement from the company.
For me personally it’s hard to distinguish between the two. Until today both messages were both from EHG and the opposite of each other.
1 Like
You have pretty much no clue do you? 1 tank + 3 DD’s who don’t need to care for anything but “Don’t stand in shit!” steamroll the game. The worst outliers that a solo player can build right now times 4 IS steamrolling the game and mae it a walking simulator.
IF they balance the builds that are strong in solo play because they are broken op godlike in MP they are worthless in solo play. EHG can’t balance the solo game according to MP because if the do so every build who is able to solo content fast right now would be totaly bonkers in MP.
Just stop try to be smart for once it gets embarresing.
1 Like
Not necessarily, it depends on the specific examples you’re talking about. Take poison for example, even just capping the resist shred to 30 stacks (from memory), that won’t make it “worthless” in solo, but it will be significantly less effective than it currently is for the builds that are currently nuts in solo.
IMO, if what you say/are worried about does happen, that would be either excessive “balancing” or just doing it wrong.
It could happen, certainly, and it’s reasonable to be concerned about it.
Yeah, it would be interesting to know if EHG would still like to have an economy but haven’t quite figured out how to do it without also needing to junk the drop rates. Without them saying that, you’d kinda have to take the more recent post over the older one (unfortunately).
And mobs will die faster (as a separate thing to the incoming damage being spread between more players), especially the tougher mobs (since trash mobs will die very quickly anyway).
To be fair, I’d quite like an AH.
erm… no?
1 Like
Same happens in every Hack and Slay and in every balance cycle. There are always best builds and builds that are trash. “Worhtless” is the wrong word give or take let’s call it: “Some builds will underperform a lot to an extend you might not even kill one enemy in an expirienced MP group and you’ll have a (much) harder time solo.” . This happened to every hack and slay I played and continued in every season I droped in and most likely will continue on.
First off, those aren’t even in danger. Quit with the hyperbole on this matter. Simply make any item that has been crafted become ‘bound’ to that account and untrade/sellable, then you eliminate the vast majority of the items, and market flooding, people are crying about. It’s not rocket surgery. Sure, LP items could still be traded, but I sincerely doubt people will buy them, just to NOT craft them. And, if they do? Who cares? 99.999999999% of the time, they will be bought, crafted and removed from the economy.
Let’s not kid ourselves. This isn’t a game that will have 100s of 1000s of players, playing 18 hours a day, flooding the market with 4LP and Tier7 exalts. Ultra rare items will still be ultra rare… What’s it been now? Over a year since LP was introduced? I have 1 3LP and 0 4LP items. And most of my 2+ LP items are on common trash uniques. Worrying about the 0.0001% chance worst case scenario (that 3 and 4LP rares, and T7 Exalts will flood the markets), and sculpting the game around it is moronic, at best.
I swear. This worst case scenario, doomsaying, that so many of you are doing, is just like arguing with a 4 year old. It’s not reality, it’s some made-up fantasy, that now we have to deal with, because…in your mind…you have crafted the worst possible thing imaginable, and made it the most common scenario.
And, as far as ‘at the expense of EHGs vision’, let’s not forget, their initial vision involved a game-supported trade… not dissimilar from a bazaar or AH. So, if anything, this bastardized D3 party-only gift system is at theexpense of their vision.
1 Like
Just as LE’s will be… as soon as you put something out there people try to get the best possible outcome in every way shape or form. Humans are simply exploitive beeings and I can’t think of any failsave that worked 100%.
2 Likes
Can you point me to the exact time EHG appointed you their personal champion? I’m just curious why you feel the need rush to their rescue.
Once again, you’re inventing your own reality, passing it off as the most common scenario, and using that to defend your position. We’ve run all around this bush, hearing about RMT, players not playing the game, impossible loot drop balancing and now we’re back to the nebulous loopholes that will ruin the game.
I’m just curious if you have any real instances of games that were completely ruined, were too boring to play or outright failed, simply because of trade. Not games that failed for other reasons and had trade, but a game that failed simply due to the concept of trade (and no, D3 does not count, because it was the RMT AH that doomed it, not trade itself).
1 Like
Because every almost 100% abuse proof system in the was… wait for it… waaaaaaait for iiiiit… abused.
On top of that silly comment something more on the serious side of things. I’ll answer the why part. I look at things differently and I have different things that are important to me. This leads to different philosophies and first of all I think there should be a saystem in place that benefits as many as possible people and that is hard by itself.
When the devs answer the thread and tell us they’ll (or not) work on trade/gifting or whatever it’ll be called and put a system in place we can test it and try to make it 100% abuse proof and fail misrebale while we are at it even when we think it is abuse proof.
As I advocated elswhere… I just want trade up to (non crafted) rares as well as 0LP uniques and set items. Everything else should only be transfereable due the gifting system in place. This might lead to a faster completion of the story part but every meaningfull drop must be farmed.
No need to change droprates… no need to change gifting and make all the workhours meaningless… aquisition of items come from gameplay not from “trade” (while gifting is kind of the same thing in a group that works togheter). Noone looses anything but some hours of tutorial aka story part most people don’t care for anyway.
Not having those didn’t mean they didn’t want to. It simply meant that they had a small dev team and adding those things were a lower priority than adding content.
I’m not sure how these two are even compatible. But I guess maybe it depends on what you meant by “GGG trading system”?
We really like the GGG trading system a lot and want that same sort of market to happen.
You’re right though, we are trying to avoid gold sellers being a thing.
I don’t know how they could be compatible either. 4 years ago, I wasn’t trying to suggest that they were either.
1 Like