If you are going to gender lock us for classes, I think it would be nice if you gave us some armour sets that are designed for female classes. Right now all the armour sets are large, clunky, mideval type sets.
Just a thought
6 Likes
LMAO its the stats that give the armour its strength not the look.
Were not living in the âreal worldâ here.
lol
1 Like
And all the bikini armors had such bad stats they got destroyed. Now you only have the real deal left.
2 Likes
That doesnât mean that LE doesnât try to follow a theme and stay true to it. And last I checked, âWaifu RPGâ wasnât it.
2 Likes
That had me laughing and i was at once motivated to re-watch the Epic NPC Man Bikini armor episodes. 
1 Like
Not so sure about that.
While browsing cosmetics (i.e. armor in the shop) i once experienced a glitch where the armor loaded a little bit slower than the body on which the armor was put upon. And now i can assure you that the body beneath the armor had a anatomic complete rendered upper female body. Or in other words, i saw a nip slip.
On the other hand it was a one-time experience.
So you are most probably right.
My point is mostly that, for this to work like OP wants, you would need ridiculous stuff like âThe thong of durabilityâ that gives you 1k armor or similar stuff that just feels silly.
It would feel stupid to have a loincloth give you better stats than a piece of real armor and yet that is always what happens in games that want to âfeminizeâ these items.
It depends what he wants. If he wants ârealisticâ armour designed for the female form (as in the second post) thatâs different to if he just wants female characters to wear bikinis & high heels.
What is ârealisticâ armour designed for the female form, though? There doesnât even exist ârealisticâ armour designed for the male form. Chest armour doesnât conform to the wearerâs form. Itâs just a generic âwall of steelâ to stop attacks.
Something which I enjoy in EHGâs design is that they have actually done this for their armour. There are no body armours with âpecsâ (so no Batman in this game ).
So if we donât have âmasculineâ armour, why should we have âfeminineâ armour?
Yeah, thatâs what ârealisticâ chest armour would be. Armour which is designed to protect the wearer, itâs unlikely to be form fitting & designed to follow every ab on the wearerâs torso. If youâve seen what mediaeval armour looks like then thatâs what ârealisticâ body armour is in this context. There were suits of armour that more closely mimicked the idealisef male form but thouse would have been for show rather than âworkingâ armour because they would have been significantly more expensive to make & repair after battle.
Exactly.
Itâll look very similar to ârealisticâ armour designed for the male form, possibly with slightly more space up to & broarder around the hips to provide similar levels of comfort & protection. But no boob armour.
1 Like
less clothes and showing more skin = more defense by rpg logic.
Wizard in a thong? Make it happen EHG!
Giving the term âbreastplateâ another meaning? 
Also @DJSamhein your first post made my day 
1 Like
2 Likes