Ok, provide em then, don’t just say ‘trust me bro’ with it.
If you want facts to support you then you need to provide em.
Then it needs to be seen if the method of getting those facts actually allows the proper options to voice it against the premise you seek.
Then you need to reveal the results of that accordingly, sustaining or not sustaining your initial thoughts.
Have you preampled it with a vote? So you get an actual spread rather then simply some signatures which sustain your thought that it’s a ‘yes’?
Because ‘hundreds of signatures’ is really not hard to get when there’s about 600k or so potential players for LE… I think more even.
Your lack of comprehension is not the fault of the writer, it’s your personal shortcoming.
Albeit it definitely would be better for people to generally dumb things down a bit more, which is not always possible.
Also I wanna point out:
This is primarily you actually.
Your way of writing depicts a hefty emotional inbalance regarding the topic.
Unless you’ve never learned any sorts of manners, which is also problematic, but on a general position.
So maybe start properly writing instead of flinging shit around like a monkey and then people are actually willing to properly engage and go in-depth about things.
Because the moment they say ‘no, I don’t think so’ they get battered with shit into their face rather then proper explanations and getting into actual reasonings.
Entirely on your there, nobody else. The only person putting themselves on a pedestal are you, stating that everyone not of your oppinion is simply wrong and incompetent, positioning yourself as having the moral high ground.
Which plainly spoken makes me kinda disgusted at you.
It’s apalling and actually the reason as to why people state ‘we can’t have nice things’.
Why so? (You see, explanations, might do you well to include them in your posts)
Because people either become defensive, which is not conductive to a proper discussion.
Or they become tired and just let it be since nobody wants to interact with a exhausting, arrogant and self-centered person which lacks the ability to look beyond their own personal and extremely limited little world.
Yes, because the genre is not very diverse yet and sub-genres haven’t properly formed.
100% true.
Has to do with the complexity of the systems commonly needed and the lack of large-scale engagement of individuals comparatively to other genres at large.
I got a very simple question:
What do you think people are doing here repeatedly… towards you actually?
Many suffer in silence.
Those that actually write out are the ones you’re ripping into willy-nilly though.
That’s kinda telling.
Also, me for example… why do you think I’m ripping into you here so much and not for example Kiadaw despite not fully agreeing with that post? Or Makszi despite simply telling you off rather then providing any reasoning? Or ResplendentEgo despite misunderstanding the whole situation?
Ask yourself… why would I only do it with you?
Maybe you can finally reach an answer that you are the problem here and not everyone else you try to make it out to be.
Fix your writing, start properly asking questions if you’re unsure what someone means, go into details for explanations when someone doesn’t entirely pick up on what you convey and provide proper examples or best-case actual proof. And not flimsy made-up facts saying ‘I did xyz’ without anyone knowing the methodology used to get your results in the first place and then also not revealing what the journey to achieve them even was.
I could be misremembering.